The VAR Review: Van Dijk red card, Manchester United penalty

Video assistant referee causes controversy each week within the Premier League, however how are selections made, and are they right?

After every weekend, we check out the main incidents to look at and clarify the method each when it comes to VAR protocol and the Laws of the Game.

– How VAR selections have affected each Prem membership in 2023-24
– VAR within the Premier League: Ultimate information

In this week’s VAR Review: Was it the proper determination to ship off Liverpool defender Virgil van Dijk at Newcastle United? Was the VAR proper to not intervene to cancel the penalty for Manchester United or the red card for Nottingham Forest defender Joe Worrall?

Possible red card overturn: Van Dijk deal with on Isak

What occurred: Newcastle United had been 1-0 in entrance within the twenty eighth minute when Alexander Isak regarded to spin round Virgil van Dijk on the sting of the realm. The striker went to the bottom, and referee John Brooks instantly produced the red card. Liverpool boss Jurgen Klopp was livid on the determination, and the VAR, Stuart Attwell, started a evaluation (watch here).

VAR determination: Red card stands.

VAR evaluation: As Isak would have had a transparent run on aim after turning Van Dijk, the decision-making course of is easy for Brooks: If it is a foul, it must be a red card for denying an apparent goal-scoring alternative (DOGSO).

The triple jeopardy exception, which says a participant should not be despatched off if they’re making a real try for the ball, applies solely inside the realm. This is as a result of the attacking aspect could be awarded a penalty, so the clear goal-scoring alternative nonetheless exists. While a free kick continues to be an opportunity to attain, it has a a lot decrease likelihood of success than a penalty. If Van Dijk had fouled Isak inside the realm, it could have been solely a yellow card.

After the match, Klopp nonetheless stated he disagreed with the red card, however Van Dijk went via Isak to win the ball and it was a textbook DOGSO state of affairs.

Van Dijk’s response to determination is more likely to result in a Football Association cost, and potential extension to the obligatory one-game suspension.

Possible red card overturn: Worrall on Fernandes

What occurred: Bruno Fernandes broke via the centre on the sting of the field within the 67th minute and went to floor underneath a problem from Joe Worrall. Referee Stuart Attwell gave the free kick and produced the red card for denying an apparent goal-scoring alternative.

VAR determination: Red card stands.

VAR evaluation: While Attwell may need had a easy determination to uphold the red card for Van Dijk when he was the VAR on Sunday for the Newcastle-Liverpool recreation, this was not so minimize and dried.

Firstly, not being the final defender is not the important thing consideration for a red card, although one other defender being forward of the play is usually a issue. The referee has to ask himself whether or not Fernandes would have had the possibility to attain from the place he was in — whatever the presence of Willy Boly closing in.

The Van Dijk dismissal gives the right comparability. Isak had created the possibility for himself and would have had a transparent run on aim. With Fernandes there was a better query mark over his means to gather the ball forward of both Boly or goalkeeper Matt Turner.

It’s an in depth name, and subjectively may have gone both method. But there’s nothing that means both Boly or Turner would undoubtedly have been capable of problem earlier than the United participant bought a shot on aim. The VAR, Robert Jones, checked the state of affairs and with it being a 50-50 name on a red card he would not intervene to overturn.

Possible penalty overturn: Danilo foul on Rashford

What occurred: Manchester United had been awarded a penalty within the seventy fifth minute when Marcus Rashford went down underneath a problem from Danilo. Referee Attwell instantly pointed to the spot, and the VAR started a verify.

VAR determination: Penalty stands, scored by Fernandes.

VAR evaluation: This was the second of three selections that angered Forest boss Steve Cooper, however there isn’t any likelihood of this penalty being reversed. As quickly because the VAR confirms the lower-body contact from the Forest defender on Rashford, the on-field determination of penalty is supportable.

Cooper additionally wished a red card for Scott McTominay late within the recreation for a excessive foot on Cheikhou Kouyaté, however there isn’t any likelihood that may be thought of severe foul play.

The Forest supervisor complained that the VAR had made the selections too shortly, however in all three conditions there was no different seemingly consequence. Cooper would have a extra legitimate criticism if he argued about not getting the calls in his favour from the referee, however the VAR would not intervene.

Possible penalty overturn: Handball by Egan

What occurred: Manchester City had been awarded a penalty within the thirty fifth minute when Julián Álvarez tried to chop the ball again into the field and it hit the raised arm of John Egan. Referee Jarred Gillett pointed to the spot.

VAR determination: Penalty stands, missed by Erling Haaland.

VAR evaluation: As talked about in final week’s VAR Review, we’ll see a wide range of handball selections that folks assume are the identical, however in actuality, each particular person state of affairs has its personal distinctive deserves and issues. That does not change the truth that the perceived inconsistencies frustrate supporters.

Manchester United had been irritated that they did not get a penalty at Tottenham Hotspur, with the VAR selecting to not penalise Cristian Romero despite the fact that he had his arm out as a result of he was near the ball.

As effectively as proximity, a participant’s anticipated physique place for his or her motion needs to be taken under consideration — so the place ought to Egan have his arm when he is sliding? The tips state that if a participant has their arm above shoulder peak they’re taking an elevated danger of being penalised. Egan actually does this and prevents the ball from reaching Haaland inside the realm.

Possible penalty: Robinson on Haaland

What occurred: Just earlier than half-time Haaland went to the bottom after being held by Jack Robinson, and checked out Gillett asking for a penalty. The referee waved away the appeals.

VAR determination: No penalty.

VAR evaluation:

While Robinson did put his arms round Haaland earlier than the ball was performed in, it actually did not impede the Manchester City striker or make him go to the bottom in the way in which he did. It was the proper determination to not award a spot kick.

Possible offside: McBurnie on Bogle aim

What occurred: Sheffield United equalised within the 86th minute when Jayden Bogle fired throughout Éderson and into the other nook. But Oliver McBurnie was seemingly in an offside place when Bogle hit the shot, so was he interfering with the Man City goalkeeper?

VAR determination: Goal stands.

VAR evaluation: On the face of it, there gave the impression to be an offside determination to be made right here, however the truth is, Kyle Walker was taking part in the entire Sheffield United assault onside by being laid off the pitch. If a defender leaves the sector both by their momentum or with out permission from the referee, they’re thought of to be on the road nearest to them. So Walker in impact created an offside line degree with the goalkeeper, and no attacking participant could possibly be offside.

If McBurnie had been offside, the VAR would definitely have had a choice to make, as Ederson collided with the striker in trying to make the save. There could be an argument that the ball had already gone previous Ederson earlier than he got here into contact with McBurnie, so it could have been a controversial second both method.

Arsenal’s second aim in opposition to Fulham got here in comparable circumstances, with Calvin Bassey down injured close to the aim line earlier than Edward Nketiah scored. The Arsenal striker was most likely behind his nearest defender anyway, however it wasn’t even a consideration with one other Fulham participant on the ground forward of him.

Possible penalty: Handball by Aarons

What occurred: James Maddison took a shot within the tenth minute, with Max Aarons getting a block in. There had been appeals for a penalty for handball.

VAR determination: No penalty.

VAR evaluation: The ball hit Aarons towards the highest of his arm, however it’s near his physique and never making it unnaturally larger.

It may nonetheless be a penalty on this state of affairs if the Bournemouth participant had leant into the ball together with his arm, however that wasn’t the case right here.

Possible red card: Romero on Semenyo

What occurred: Cristian Romero gained the ball off Antoine Semenyo within the thirty sixth minute and Tottenham Hotspur broke on the counter, however was there a case for a red card in opposition to the defender?

VAR determination: No red card.

VAR evaluation: Referee Tim Robinson actually missed a free kick in opposition to Romero, as he kicked via Semenyo to get to the ball — simply as Van Dijk did when making an attempt to win the ball off Isak. But there was no extreme drive within the problem and no likelihood that the VAR, John Brooks, would intervene to advise a red card.

Possible red card: Perisic on Aarons

What occurred: Ivan Perisic was booked within the seventieth minute after an altercation on the touchline with Aarons, however may the yellow have been upgraded to a red? (watch here)

VAR determination: No red card.

VAR evaluation: When deciding if this needs to be a red card for violent conduct, the VAR should think about how Perisic has come to throw his arm towards Aarons. It’s clear from the replay that Perisic has a maintain of the AFC Bournemouth participant’s shirt across the shoulder space, after which pushes away from this level. So reasonably than throwing an arm at Aarons, Perisic is absolutely pushing at his opponent.

The VAR is not going to intervene and counsel a yellow card is not ample punishment in a state of affairs like this.

Possible penalty: Paquetá on Estupiñán

What occurred: Pervis Estupiñán broke into the field within the 51st minute and was challenged by Lucas Paquetá, with the Brighton & Hove Albion defender going to the bottom underneath a shoulder-to-shoulder problem. Referee Anthony Taylor ignored the appeals for a penalty (watch here).

VAR determination: No penalty.

VAR evaluation: Players are allowed to problem opponents with their shoulder, and it solely turns into an offence if it is clearly within the again or with extreme drive. Paquetá took a danger in the way in which he challenged Estupiñán, however the Brighton participant additionally leant into the West Ham United participant. This form of state of affairs will at all times stay with the on-field referee and the VAR will not intervene.

Possible penalty: Handball by Coufal

What occurred: Brighton appealed for a penalty when Estupinan tried to chop the ball again inside the realm, and the ball hit the arm of Vladimír Coufal. Again the referee wasn’t thinking about a spot kick (watch here).

VAR determination: No penalty.

VAR evaluation: There had been claims that this incident was similar to the penalty Lewis Dunk conceded in opposition to Luton firstly of the season — however that is not the case in any respect.

While the higher determination in Dunk’s case would have been no penalty, there are extra similarities to the penalty Egan gave away, as in each circumstances the arms had been raised.

In Coufal’s case, he had his arm on the bottom supporting the physique, and that is within the exemptions in opposition to a handball offence. A penalty ought to by no means be awarded on this state of affairs.

Possible penalty: Lockyer foul on Silva

What occurred: In the 52nd minute Thiago Silva tried to spin previous Tom Lockyer and gave the impression to be held. Referee Robert Jones allowed play to proceed.

VAR determination: No penalty.

VAR evaluation: While the Luton Town defender was holding onto Silva’s shirt for a short while, that alone is not sufficient to represent a penalty, because it has to have an effect on the participant having the ability to problem for or play the ball.

Lockyer actually took an opportunity, however the holding wasn’t extended and a VAR won’t get entangled in a state of affairs corresponding to this.

Some elements of this text embrace data offered by the Premier League and PGMOL.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button